With this small article I tried to shed light on some ambiguities of general relativity, that is, some points on which I found several conflicting opinions (even between teachers and researchers).
I hope the 20 articles listed in the bibliography, for not even 4 pages of research, can be evidence of my effort.
This is a sincere attempt at scientific sharing, born of passion and love for Physics. Therefore I am very open to corrections and/or suggestions, as long as they are made with constructive intent and in respect of education.
Thank you all, Alessandro.
Questo sito o gli strumenti terzi da questo utilizzati si avvalgono di cookie necessari al funzionamento ed utili alle finalità illustrate nella Cookie Policy. Chiudendo questo banner, cliccando su un link o proseguendo la navigazione in altra maniera, acconsente all'uso dei cookie. Clicca qui per maggiori informazioni
Questo sito utilizza i cookie per fornire la migliore esperienza di navigazione possibile. Continuando a utilizzare questo sito senza modificare le impostazioni dei cookie o cliccando su "Accetta" permetti il loro utilizzo.
1 Comment
This looks interesting, Alessandro. You might like to compare it with something I’ve written: http://physicsdetective.com/misconceptions-in-gravitational-physics/
The infalling observer doesn’t cross the event horizon at v = c. Because at the event horizon, c = 0.
He doesn’t reach the event horizon, he turns into a gamma ray burst. See Friedwardt WInterberg’s 2001 paper Gamma Ray Bursters and Lorentzian Relativity: https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/zna.2001.56.issue-12/zna-2001-1216/zna-2001-1216.pdf